- October 24, 2025
- James Doacke, et al., Australian E-Health Research Centre (CSIRO) Abbvie
Topic/Product:
CNS Disease Panel 120, Inflammation Panel 250
Disease Area:
Alzheimer's Disease
Sample Type:
Plasma
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Plasma phospho-tau217 (p-tau217) has been shown to demonstrate equal performance to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to predict amyloid beta (Aβ) positivity. Although such high-performing plasma tests provide confirmatory information on Aβ status, further information is desperately needed to discern optimal blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) stage.
METHODS
From the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle study, 387 participants underwent [18F]NAV4694 (Aβ) and [18F]MK-6240 (tau) PET scans, a blood test to measure for p-tau217 (ALZpath and Lumipulse), and the Alamar Biosciences NULISASeq platform (120 central nervous system [CNS] and 250 inflammatory proteins). Individual p-tau217 assays were compared with selected biomarker sets from the Alamar panel to predict AD stage.
RESULTS
Using a panel of biomarkers was significantly better at predicting disease stage compared with p-tau217 alone; however, the difference was dependent upon p-tau217 assay.
DISCUSSION
Utility of extra BBMs in addition to p-tau217 provides useful information regarding overall disease burden during the separate stages of AD.
Highlights
- Of the separate assays for p-tau217, the Lumipulse assay demonstrated significantly better performance than the ALZpath assay to separate disease stages.
- Multivariate blood-based biomarker (BBM) models are significantly better at predicting the presence of A/T from A–T– as compared with any p-tau217 assay.
- Multivariate BBM models have higher area under the curve values to predict disease stage than Alamar and ALZpath p-tau217, but not Lumipulse p-tau217 during later disease stage comparisons.
Authors & Affiliations
James D. Doecke¹, Edwin Stage², Christopher Fowler³, Vincent Doré⁴⁵, Nils Boehm⁶, Christoph Kleinert⁶, Malleswari Challagundla⁶, Azadeh Feizpour³⁴, Larry Ward³, Jurgen Fripp¹, Colin L. Masters³, Christopher Rowe³⁴, Anthony Bannon²
¹ Australian E-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Herston, Queensland, Australia
² AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
³ The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
⁴ Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
⁵ Australian E-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
⁶ Quantitative, Translational and ADME Sciences, Biomarker Bioanalysis, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
